have they tried banning cfcs?
Considering the more dire situation ITTL, you'd think that they'd do it any faster. After all, isn't what had happened IOTL?CFCs have been banned by international convention since 2014 (although they are still being used in some industrial capacity in a few countries) while HCFCs and HFCs are still in use but are being phased out in Europe, China, and the U.S for environmental reasons.
The science was really only firmly established on the issue by the late 1990s (compared to the 1970s/80s OTL), and some countries did take action during the 2000s, it just took until 2014 for something even resembling the Montreal Protocol of OTL.Considering the more dire situation ITTL, you'd think that they'd do it any faster. After all, isn't what had happened IOTL?
Oof. Given it took 20+ years for ozone to peak after OTL's montreal conference, this suggests ozone layer damage will peak out around 2034. Given what's gone on in TTL as is...The science was really only firmly established on the issue by the late 1990s (compared to the 1970s/80s OTL), and some countries did take action during the 2000s, it just took until 2014 for something even resembling the Montreal Protocol of OTL.
A map of collapsed governments?This was in my backlog, so I basically just posted it to prove this timeline isn't dead lol
Be on the lookout for some actual content coming soon!
OTL the major problems started in the polar regions so it's actually probably "that far south." Which is actually even worse since LA is only about 30 north. In any case most ideas to inject more ozone i to the atmosphere (or make it from oxygen) will run into the fact the crap depleting it is still present. Odds are they wouldn't be able to keep ahead of the problem.One thing I was wondering is if there are any radical forms of geoengineering being developed? I know there are some for OTL, but are governments investigating plans for "ozone reconstruction" considering that stay at home orders are issued for American cities in the south and southwest. Which makes me wonder, how bad are things in Central America if places as far north as Atlanta and Denver are having lethal UV exposure?
Judging by the initial graphic it appears Tresckow is correct:OTL the major problems started in the polar regions so it's actually probably "that far south." Which is actually even worse since LA is only about 30 north. In any case most ideas to inject more ozone i to the atmosphere (or make it from oxygen) will run into the fact the crap depleting it is still present. Odds are they wouldn't be able to keep ahead of the problem.
I think by this point ITTL the ozone layer has essentially collapsed for much of the year, if not entirely, and there are probably certain times during the year when UV radiation is near-free to bombard the Earth with very little ozone to shield it. At that point, equatorial regions would fair worse due to directly facing the sun, negating any protection that a more consistent concentration of ozone would have if that layer just doesn't exist. Then again I don't know, I've also heard that the issue would have always impacted the Global North the hardest and so that's why every part of the developed world took it seriously, despite not doing the same for climate change in OTL.OTL the major problems started in the polar regions so it's actually probably "that far south." Which is actually even worse since LA is only about 30 north. In any case most ideas to inject more ozone i to the atmosphere (or make it from oxygen) will run into the fact the crap depleting it is still present. Odds are they wouldn't be able to keep ahead of the problem.
Unfortunately accurate. It's a sad fact that humans tend to be more inclined to fix a mess if it impacts them personally.I think by this point ITTL the ozone layer has essentially collapsed for much of the year, if not entirely, and there are probably certain times during the year when UV radiation is near-free to bombard the Earth with very little ozone to shield it. At that point, equatorial regions would fair worse due to directly facing the sun, negating any protection that a more consistent concentration of ozone would have if that layer just doesn't exist. Then again I don't know, I've also heard that the issue would have always impacted the Global North the hardest and so that's why every part of the developed world took it seriously, despite not doing the same for climate change in OTL.
OTL the major problems started in the polar regions so it's actually probably "that far south." Which is actually even worse since LA is only about 30 north. In any case most ideas to inject more ozone i to the atmosphere (or make it from oxygen) will run into the fact the crap depleting it is still present. Odds are they wouldn't be able to keep ahead of the problem.
Ozone-depleting substances can cause ozone depletion worldwide. It's just that the polar vortex causes these substances to collect over Antarctica (and over the Arctic in smaller quantities). But since basically nobody lives in Antarctica, ozone depletion's effects are mostly seen in the tropics, where a more direct angle will cause greater UV exposure.I think by this point ITTL the ozone layer has essentially collapsed for much of the year, if not entirely, and there are probably certain times during the year when UV radiation is near-free to bombard the Earth with very little ozone to shield it. At that point, equatorial regions would fair worse due to directly facing the sun, negating any protection that a more consistent concentration of ozone would have if that layer just doesn't exist. Then again I don't know, I've also heard that the issue would have always impacted the Global North the hardest and so that's why every part of the developed world took it seriously, despite not doing the same for climate change in OTL.
There are definitely geoengineering proposals to inject some particle or chemical into the atmosphere to reduce global warming or decrease ozone depletion. But like OTL it's far too risky to gamble the entire planet on some untested theories.One thing I was wondering is if there are any radical forms of geoengineering being developed? I know there are some for OTL, but are governments investigating plans for "ozone reconstruction" considering that stay at home orders are issued for American cities in the south and southwest. Which makes me wonder, how bad are things in Central America if places as far north as Atlanta and Denver are having lethal UV exposure?
To start with, that'd fuck whatever's left of America's agricultural industry. So no.Have they considered nuking yellowstone, long valley, valles caldera, lake toba, taupo caldera and aira caldera? Setting off all six known supervolcanoes at once would at least change things.
I said it would change things. I did not say it'd help.To start with, that'd fuck whatever's left of America's agricultural industry. So no.
Fair enough, but to be fair it's decisive action. Technically.I said it would change things. I did not say it'd help.
Excepting Yellowstone (and even that isn't imminent) none of those are known to be ready to blow so I doubt it would be any good.Have they considered nuking yellowstone, long valley, valles caldera, lake toba, taupo caldera and aira caldera? Setting off all six known supervolcanoes at once would at least change things.
That's why I proposed using a nuke for encouragement.Excepting Yellowstone (and even that isn't imminent) none of those are known to be ready to blow so I doubt it would be any good.