Hey all,
So, as we all know, the 19th century German Confederation is remembered as being largely dominated by the Austrian Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia. Pan-German nationalism emerged as a popular movement during the 19th century as well, and after 1871, the German Empire was formed under Prussian leadership.

There are plenty of timelines which explore Germany never unifying; Germany unifying under Austria; or Germany unifying under Prussia but taking a different path. However, the Prussia and Austria were not the only two important states in the German Confederation. What if Germany was united under a dynasty other than the Hohenzollerns or the Habsburgs?
The Austrian Habsburgs held the highest feudal rank, using the title of emperor; the Hohenzollerns were kings. Aside from Prussia, there were four other states which held the rank of kingdom: Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and Wurttemberg. Of these, Bavaria was the most powerful Catholic state in Germany aside from Austria. The Wittelsbachs had long-lasting dynastic ties to the Habsburgs, and a Bavarian prince ruled the Kingdom of Greece. If the Wittelsbachs led German Unification with Habsburg support, then the Habsburgs would have a strong permanent ally in Germany and in the Balkans.
Saxony was led by the House of Wettin, cadet branches of which ruled in Belgium, and would eventually come to rule in Britain; therefore, it held prestige and some international sway. Geographically, Saxony was situated in between Prussia and Austria, and though its monarchy was Catholic, its population was largely Lutheran; I can imagine a scenario in which Saxony emerges as an intermediary between Austrian and Prussian ambitions, and Dresden emerges as the capital of a unified Germany after a series of compromises.

Finally, there was a self-proclaimed German Empire established at Frankfurt, which emerged during the Revolutions of 1848-1849. The Frankfurt Parliament sought a liberal parliamentary government headed by a hereditary emperor. However, there were radical factions within the Frankfurt Parliament as well. Some of these were what we might recognise today as "Leftists" (though at this point, the Radical factions all called themselves Leftists, since they sat on the left side of the assembly); these were largely inspired by the egalitarian, populist, republican ideals of the French Revolution, and would go on to inspire early socialists. Others were more bourgeois in their interests, seeking to establish a liberal republic which protected the interests of the emerging bourgeoisie from the hereditary aristocracy, taking the United States as their inspiration. And of course there were centrists and moderates, as well as a reactionary faction which desired greater unification of Germany, but under the leadership of the feudal aristocracy. Regardless, this motley collection of interests led popular revolutions across the German states for a couple years, and though they failed to create a new regime, they did force many states to create or expand constitutional protections for the common citizen as well as spread German nationalism as a populist ideal.

So, what if Germany was unified by any of these states, instead of Prussia or Austria? How would this come about? What would be different about German political culture?
 
I had an idea once long ago that I had no idea how to make work, but it was basically a Hannover-united Germany in personal union with the United Kingdom. I've always thought it was interesting.
 
I understood the original quesiton as that Germany is to "unify" in the 19th century, not that it was necessarily "constrained" by houses still extant in the 19th century.
Ah, true. I wonder how things would have been different if Maximilian III Joseph had an heir, or if the War of the Bavarian Succession had gone differently.
 
The Empire could have been United by the Descendants of Frederick barbarossa providing the papacy didn't turn on the dynasty.

The Karling managed to keep control of the territories composing Germany.

Otto the Great does not reunite the Holy Roman Empire but focuses on create an independent Germany and expanding Eastwood instead of Mediterranean.

You could cry and OC character let's say charlemagne has a second living son who get Germany. But with Louis the pious gets the rest.
 
Would a smaller state unifying Germany in the post-Napoleonic era really have the capital of the new German Empire in their territory? The capital of the German Confederation was Frankfurt after all and I don't think a smaller state like Saxony or even Bavaria would really have the pull to demand otherwise. Bavaria is usually cited as the third option. It would be very interesting if they unified Germany with 1866 internal borders and left both Prussia and Austria out.

As for another dynasty, you could have the deal that the position of Kaiser rotates between the royal houses which I guess would be those of Prussia, Bavaria, Saxony, Württemburg, Hanover, and perhaps Austria as well (Württemburg's royals seem a little out of place compared to the other group IMO, but they are still a kingdom all the same). I guess if the ruler was underage/incapable (i.e. Ludwig II of Bavaria) they could be skipped over and the order of which ruler gets to become Emperor shifted in compensation.
 
I think OP is limiting unifiers to the states he mentioned in the first post, folks.
Napoléonic France. It sounds weird, but hearme out. German nationalism was awakened in opposition to Napoléon I, and Bismarck used war with Napoléon III to unify Germany, ergo, the argument COULD be made that France SUCCESSFULLY united Germany
 
Top