Just saw this.
https://www.quora.com/Was-Apollo-11-possibly-the-riskiest-mission-that-NASA-has-ever-undertaken
"The riskiest mission was the final Challenger flight. The people involved knew that the O-ring was charring when the weather was cold. Originally, there was a standard that if there was charring on the ring, then that was no longer safe. Charring appeared. Then it was decided that if the charring was more than 25% of the ring, it wasn’t safe. The charring exceeded 25%. Then it was decided that if the charring was more than 50%, it wasn’t safe. You can see the clear pattern and what it will inevitably lead to. The range safety officer knew that the fateful flight was the coldest day that they’d ever launched. He knew the O-ring was burning through more and more dependent on cold. launching was an unacceptable risk. As the final authority, he aborted the launch. But the executives at NASA didn’t like that. They went to Morton-Thiokol. The senior engineer at Morton-Thiokol told his execs that it was an unacceptable risk. They, based on no more factual basis than the NASA execs, decided that their engineer was being overly cautious. They told NASA it was OK to launch. The NASA execs told the Cape to launch.
To launch when it is clear that there is a high probability of failure clearly makes this the riskiest mission NASA ever undertook.
p.s. No criminal charges were brought."
Everyone was saying to abort the launch. What happens if they actually do so? Not only that, but everyone tells NASA to take a look at their work protocols and forces them to realize they're going too fast?
I mean when you're getting to the point when you're allowed to launch with half an O-ring missing because people were getting sick of delays and you can SEE the charring prior to launch...
You'd have figured that they'd rethink their protocols for the first flight to have a civilian teacher on board...
https://www.quora.com/Was-Apollo-11-possibly-the-riskiest-mission-that-NASA-has-ever-undertaken
"The riskiest mission was the final Challenger flight. The people involved knew that the O-ring was charring when the weather was cold. Originally, there was a standard that if there was charring on the ring, then that was no longer safe. Charring appeared. Then it was decided that if the charring was more than 25% of the ring, it wasn’t safe. The charring exceeded 25%. Then it was decided that if the charring was more than 50%, it wasn’t safe. You can see the clear pattern and what it will inevitably lead to. The range safety officer knew that the fateful flight was the coldest day that they’d ever launched. He knew the O-ring was burning through more and more dependent on cold. launching was an unacceptable risk. As the final authority, he aborted the launch. But the executives at NASA didn’t like that. They went to Morton-Thiokol. The senior engineer at Morton-Thiokol told his execs that it was an unacceptable risk. They, based on no more factual basis than the NASA execs, decided that their engineer was being overly cautious. They told NASA it was OK to launch. The NASA execs told the Cape to launch.
To launch when it is clear that there is a high probability of failure clearly makes this the riskiest mission NASA ever undertook.
p.s. No criminal charges were brought."
Everyone was saying to abort the launch. What happens if they actually do so? Not only that, but everyone tells NASA to take a look at their work protocols and forces them to realize they're going too fast?
I mean when you're getting to the point when you're allowed to launch with half an O-ring missing because people were getting sick of delays and you can SEE the charring prior to launch...
You'd have figured that they'd rethink their protocols for the first flight to have a civilian teacher on board...
Last edited: