So I am currently reading Peter C. Perdue's excellent book China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia and came across something interesting.
Apparently, during the Ming dynasty, the Oirats had an effective non-Genghisid chieftain by the name of Esen, who captured the Zhengtong Emperor at Tumu in 1449. Instead of marching on Beijing, which Perdue claims would have been relatively easy (later it was not so), Esen extorted 20,000 taels of silk from the garrison commander at Dating. Perdue uses this incident to question whether Esen really wanted to recreate Genghis' Empire.
IOTL, Esen did return two months later, but this had given Yu Qian, the emperor's regent, the time to mount a capable defense. Esen saw the siege was futile, and abandoned it.
But what if Esen did have the inclination to create an ersatz-Yuan dynasty? If he descended on Beijing after Tumu could he have easily seized the city? And would be have a chance to take direct control over at least Northern China?
Apparently, during the Ming dynasty, the Oirats had an effective non-Genghisid chieftain by the name of Esen, who captured the Zhengtong Emperor at Tumu in 1449. Instead of marching on Beijing, which Perdue claims would have been relatively easy (later it was not so), Esen extorted 20,000 taels of silk from the garrison commander at Dating. Perdue uses this incident to question whether Esen really wanted to recreate Genghis' Empire.
IOTL, Esen did return two months later, but this had given Yu Qian, the emperor's regent, the time to mount a capable defense. Esen saw the siege was futile, and abandoned it.
But what if Esen did have the inclination to create an ersatz-Yuan dynasty? If he descended on Beijing after Tumu could he have easily seized the city? And would be have a chance to take direct control over at least Northern China?