October 1471
Soundtrack:
Pierre Attaingnant - Pavane
*exterior* *Bristol* *we see Richard of Gloucester and his army attempting to take the city* *only to find the city refuse to acknowledge them* *in fact, one of the soldiers on the wall turns around and drops his trousers telling the duke of Gloucester to “kiss my arse”*
*next thing we see that soldier lying prone, with an arrow shaft protruding from his buttock*
*exterior* *Pamplona* *the Courtyard of the Cour des Comptes* *there is a vicious fight going on* *looks more like a beatdown between two gangs*
*exterior* *Valencia* *King Juan II of Aragon is out hunting with his son and younger daughter when he receives a letter* *he opens it and reads it* *frowns*
ernando, King of Sicily: what is it, father?
Juan II: there has been a fight in Pamplona.
Fernando: the Agramontese and the Beaumontese again?
Juan II: only now not only is the Marshal of Navarre
[1] dead but he managed to slit the Constable of Navarre’s
[2] throat before he departed this life. *we see his face twists into a scowl at the news*
*exterior* *Lancastrian court at Oxford* *a messenger in papal livery passes through the court* *cut to Prince Edward removing the archbishop’s mitre from the head of George Neville, Archbishop of York, and replacing it with a crimson galero
[3]*
Thomas, 2e Baron Stanley
[4]: my congratulations, Milord Warwick, on your brother’s elevation.
Warwick the Kingmaker: my gratitude, Lord Stanley.
Stanley: truly your family is to be congratulated in succeeding on reaching so high…cardinal in the family, the future queen.
Warwick: *says nothing*
Stanley: *quietly* although I would warn you that rumours could once more spread that you intend to change sides again, sir
Warwick: *glares at him* is that a threat, in your words, sir?
Stanley: no threat. One of such
humble stock as myself wouldn’t dream of daring to advise someone as great as yourself. However, my brother writes me that King Edward has indicated himself…favourable…towards your daughter, the duchess of Clarence’s entreaties.
Warwick: and what has she entreated of him?
Stanley: you should ask King Edward that.
That King Edward, not
this King Edward- *looks at the prince of Wales*
Warwick: he is not king, yet, sir
Stanley: in short time, he will be- if the rumours are true.
Warwick: more rumour and superstition, Lord Stanley?
Stanley: there are those that say the reason the king is not here is because he has suffered an attack of his illness once more. That the news of your granddaughter’s birth
broke his…sensitive…health.
Warwick: *tightly* what a ridiculous rumour.
Stanley: my apologies, Milord, I did not mean to speculate on the state of the king’s health. I simply thought it a more…
likely…explanation of either his Majesty’s nor his wife’s non-attendance than the other option-
Warwick: if that is the more sensible of the two options, I can’t imagine what the discarded version was.
Stanley: the voice goes that you and the prince have…fallen out, Milord. That their Majesties’ refusing to attend this ceremony is in indication of their displeasure.
Warwick: *stares woodenly ahead*
Stanley: but, I said to myself, if Milord Warwick had reached so high, there are many jackals at court who would only relish the opportunity to tear him down. *looks pointedly at both Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Wiltshire, and her son, the earl of Richmond, and then at John Beaufort, Earl of Dorset* which leaves the other option
Warwick: why should the king be present at something as simple as the elevation of my brother? King Edward was not at his enthronement at York. Was that perhaps an indication of
his displeasure?
[5]
Stanley: of course not, milord. I didn’t mean to imply-
Warwick: then you should know, Lord Stanley, that if
rumours were to get out that you are speculating on his Majesty’s health, then have no doubt that those jackals of whom you spoke will devour you as well as I, for even entertaining the idea that the king is not in the very best of health.
*exterior* *Rome* *Pope Paul II is circling a statue of a Roman emperor like he was a hyaena in a past life* *his camerlengo, Cardinal Latino Orsini, is watching him closely*
Paul II: and they found this in the Forum?
Orsini: yes, Holiness. Alongside the column of Trajan.
Paul II: *looks at the face* it doesn’t look like Trajan
Orsini: it’s believed to be the Emperor Titus, Holiness.
Paul II: *quotes Titus* Kind Rome, that hast thoust lovingly reserved the cordial of mine age to glad my heart!
Orsini: *discreetly rolls his eyes like “these damned Venetians”*
Paul II: *snaps back into reality* we would bring all of these works together, under one roof.
Orsini: these works, Holiness?
Paul II: statues, Orsini. Rome is full of reminders of her imperial glory, and yet, nothing is done about them.
Orsini: you wish to have them brought together to be destroyed?
Paul II: no! *shocked face poking over Titus’ shoulder* I wish to preserve them for posterity. *grins* remind those Medici with their *puts on “posh” accent* Accademia who the
true heirs of Rome are.
Orsini: it might be seen as sacrilegious, Holiness, for a pope to take such interest in pagan Rome. Given that many of her emperors are responsible for creating many of the church’s martyrs.
Paul II: and wasn’t Constantine a Roman emperor when he lifted our holy church from squalor? *fiercely* if Borgia were here,
he’d understand this.
Orsini: but he’s in Spain, Holiness. Trying to convince the king of Castile to accept the king of Sicily as son-in-law. *side mouth as he looks at Titus* and
you, Majesty, had the right idea of what to do with his sort
[6] .
Paul II: Cardinal Orsini, when a man collects works of art, we do not call him an idolater but we praise his taste. That is all I wish to do. These
are works of art, reminders of our history that…we have too often forgotten.
Orsini: of course sir.
Paul II: *spreads arms* do you think Titus or Marcus Aurelius would recognize Rome as she now stands? The Tiber flows through a marble wilderness?
Orsini: *silent*
Paul II: and we must see if we can do something about the Tiber
Orsini:
do, Holiness?
Paul II: the flooding. The stench and the disease that follow the flooding drying out.
Orsini: *desperately trying to change the subject* the courier of the cardinal’s hat you sent to England has written with news, Holiness.
Paul II: *almost indifferent* and what news has he?
Orsini: the first is that the duchess of Burgundy has suffered a miscarriage
[7]. Another boy, this one of around three and a half months, as the physicians do judge.
Paul II: *crosses himself*
Orsini: the second bit of news is that there is suspicion that King Henry’s wits have failed him once more. He was not present for either Cardinal Neville’s elevation, nor for his granddaughter’s christening on the feast of Saint Ursula
[8].
Paul II: are we sure it is his wits and not something mundane as-
Orsini: he apparently keeps insisting that the Princess of Wales gave birth to a son, Holy Father.
Paul II: then England has two kings, two queens, a jack and- *sighs to the statue of Titus* if only someone would’ve left out the fool.
*fade to black*
[1] Pedro I, Marshal of Navarre, leader of the Agramontese, was murdered in the courtyard of the Cour des Comptes OTL
[2] Luiz III, Conde de Lérin (as well as Juan’s son-in-law via his bastard daughter Leonor, since 1468), both the man who murdered Pedro OTL and the leader of the Beaumontese. OTL, he died in 1508. Here, he leaves an infant son.
[3] The broad-brimmed hat of cardinals
[4] While Stanley is associated with the Yorkists, that was actually William (until after Tewkesbury). During the Readeption, Thomas, was in Lancastrian employ
[5] Actually it was. The feast that was given by the Nevilles to celebrate George’s enthronement was royal in scale, and it certainly peeved Edward off. Was just one of the many “missteps” Warwick made
[6] i.e. Marranos (Spanish Jews), referencing Titus’ siege and destruction of Jerusalem
[7] Per King Louis XI’s own correspondence, there are oblique references to Margaret of York having been ill at some point in mid-1471, with Louis suggesting that she will remain ill for a few months yet. But then around autumn 1471, he stops mentioning it. Either indicating that she was found not to be pregnant or that she had suffered a miscarriage.
[8] October 21. I went back and forth on this, since a week earlier (October 13) is the Feast of Saint Edward the Confessor (cue obvious connections), but settled on Ursula. Why? Ursula was – per tradition – an English princess