RamscoopRaider
Donor
Then you need to build a lot more Rhine barges to have enough, might as well just build proper landing craft and destroyers for a conventional landingWhat if you built the causeway out of sunken Rhine barges?
Then you need to build a lot more Rhine barges to have enough, might as well just build proper landing craft and destroyers for a conventional landingWhat if you built the causeway out of sunken Rhine barges?
As bad as it is, is still a way to get an army across the Channel, something the KM couldn't ever doAssuming Team Lead Tea has the right of it and the causeway can get built sometime before the war is over... what's stopping a couple of MG nests and an AT battery from setting the Germans right back to square one? This is the Great Ardennes Traffic Jam all over again except the Allies are prepared for it.
Except that the British don't have to attack it with the RAF the way you think. As mentioned, nightattacks by the RN will do fine. Or long range artillery. Or night attacks by the RAF.I like the idea.
If the germans build a forest of anti-airguns and put all their big guns (yes, I am looking at both Schwerer Gustav guns) there and dont forget to make sure the guns can be elevated up to 45 degrees then I dont see the british having much chance.
As one mentioned, it is the BoB reverse because the British have to come to the german side of the channel and if a british pilot is shot down he ends up as POW. And the german artillery can attack any target in South England. And if they can be elevated enough the ships of the Royal Navy can be targetted by the german artillery before they can fire back.
And the Nazis have enough manpower - if they dont kill those they do not like. Send them all to the channel to build the causeway.
Seriously: did the germans have the ability to dig all the way to somewhere in Kent? Not interested in if they can invade britain this way, just want to know if an alt-chunnel can physically be dug from only one side during the warDecoy causeway to hide German attempts to tunnel under the Channel?
Seriously: did the germans have the ability to dig all the way to somewhere in Kent? Not interested in if they can invade britain this way, just want to know if an alt-chunnel can physically be dug from only one side during the war
The tunnel is itself a decoy for the attacks via Shetland, Iceland and the Isle of Wight. Bet you weren't expecting that you Britische Schweinhunde!Decoy causeway to hide German attempts to tunnel under the Channel?
The tunnel is itself a decoy for the attacks via Shetland, Iceland and the Isle of Wight. Bet you weren't expecting that you Britische Schweinhunde!
By summer 1942 the British were sending one thousand bombers raid to Colonia. Several thousand metric tons are going to make an impact in the works. The channel is over thirty kilometres in its narrowest place. This "forest of flak" is not going to protect it.I like the idea.
If the germans build a forest of anti-airguns and put all their big guns (yes, I am looking at both Schwerer Gustav guns) there and dont forget to make sure the guns can be elevated up to 45 degrees then I dont see the british having much chance.
As one mentioned, it is the BoB reverse because the British have to come to the german side of the channel and if a british pilot is shot down he ends up as POW. And the german artillery can attack any target in South England. And if they can be elevated enough the ships of the Royal Navy can be targetted by the german artillery before they can fire back.
And the Nazis have enough manpower - if they dont kill those they do not like. Send them all to the channel to build the causeway.
So, Dogger Bank I is a naval battle, Dogger Bank II is a land battle. I like this!Doggerland is the answer!
It was the original land bridge until about 10,000 years ago
Start by raising an island or two on the Dogger bank then work out from there.
The work could be aided by using whilte paint and reflective surfaces to reduce solar gain over occupied Europe. The resulting mini ice age will help lower sea level so that more land is exposed.
Like most worthwhile challenges, it just needs ingenuity, money and determination.
With the accuracy of the time 95% or more of the bombs fall in the sea.By summer 1942 the British were sending one thousand bombers raid to Colonia. Several thousand metric tons are going to make an impact in the works. The channel is over thirty kilometres in its narrowest place. This "forest of flak" is not going to protect it.
Long ago I did put forth of using Longboats for the alternate SeaLion. And it used non-strategic materialseven less plausible than this
Not really (and yet 5% of two thousand tons are 100 hundred kilograms of bombs, each time) 15, 20 kilometers inside the Channel the flak placed in Calais is not a factor. Say that light flak, even Kriegsmarine boats are placed along the 30 kilometers long construction. British bombers would be coming at 3000 meters (around 9000 feet) slow and over ligth flak.With the accuracy of the time 95% or more of the bombs fall in the sea
In terms of volume, there are any number of dams. In terms of construction approach, it's not fundamentally different to a large mole or breakwater.
The most significant comparison is the Afsluidijk, which was constructed between 1927 and 1932 to close off the Zuiderzee - until that time a tidal bay of the North Sea - and which is about two-thirds the volume of the proposed English Channel causeway.
I was assuming that the causeway would be constructed out of materials hard for a current to wash away, namely large boulders. At least at the beginning, the boulders should not be vulnerable to erosion. As the channel is narrowed, the current will strengthen and the Nazis will have to increase the size of their boulders.